I'm back in the saddle girl, so go get your feet in those stirrups!

Hello to all the lucid, lithuim loving lunatics who rightfully revere the Rational MadMan. I know its a been a while and y'all probably though big daddy had run off and left you and momma in the lurch while I frittered away my ducets on cheap women and easy booze. Well shame on you, you should know I aint no deadbeat dad by now, Ive been doing some traveling and just got back a few days ago. When poppas a rolling stone you gotta be prepared to get your wisdom on the run y'know?

Anyhow in my absence theres been some new voices ringing in on the ongoing war between the forces of light and the vaginal hive mind/eunuch underground coalition, some minor battles have been fought, and some all-new, all-different feminist lunacy has reared its illogical little misandrist mug.

Lets get cracking witht he attacking shall we?

First of all Im sure we've all heard about the whole New Avengers # 35 hoo-haa. And if you haven't then how the hell did you manage to navigate the comicnets with a blindfold on?

To recap in the latest issue of New Avenger The Hood gave a vicious and brutal beatdown to Tigra. Brian Micheal Bendis then went on Newsaram and talked about how no-one had complained. So everyone started complaining.

All the usual suspects showed up, Willow got sick and wished both marvel and DC happy assplay, as Heidi MacDonald got a little snarky, while Fortress keeper decided bendis and NA 35 is OK But Matt Brady is a Kiss ass , and Kbox proclaims overwhelming victory for the vaginal hive-mind in their battle with the forces of NewsaBendis, during Kali921's invective castigating Bendis and calling anyone who enjoys his work a moron who hates women.

Surprisingly however there was one woman who got it, and I want to extend some richly deserved applause to Cheryl Lynn for being the only cell in the vaginal hive-mind with a thought of her own.

Suffice it to say I disagree witht the vaginal hive-mind ( what a surprise eh) in point of fact I figure if the vagi-hive had any actual mind to it, they'd all be jsut as pleased as punch by NA #35. Yes Tigra got beat down, owned, punked, straigth jacked, fubar'd or knocked the fuck out depending on your particular cultural lexicon. But she got jacked like a man. There was no sexual componant, no hint of rape, no use of sex specific insults, and the artwork was even fairly unsexualised for a comic. It was really nothing more than a standard "villain gets revenge on hero while showing his badassitude" plot and the fact that the usually present sexual component was missing shows that Tigra was being treated just likea male character. People try to make something out of her not fighting back and her clothes being ripped off during the beat down, but lets face it, one sided beat downs that end with the hero in a torn and tattered costume are pretty common aint they?

What isn't so common is for a female hero to recieve a beat down without it being sexual. That honor is usually reserved for the guys. But as usual rather than recognising a feminst victory, the vagi-hive is determined to snatch defeat from the jaws of triumph, and to piss off any rational human beings while they're at it.

Tell you what, you take a look at the pages and tell me what you think.

Now, Was shes beat down like a man or like a chick?

At about the same time as Marvel got on the feminazi shitlist DC managed to piss off a whole herd of Gyinoceroi, with JLA #14.

Now of course the meme is "the only reason to have WW, BC, and Vixen featured so promonantly in the shot is cause "DC are teh mysogonist sexist haterz!!!!"

Naturally the thought that Superman and Black Lighting would be more worried by the implications of what the guys are doing to the Mamary trio never entered their little estrogen poisoned minds. The fact is, Men are pretty much programmed to respond a certain way to a women in peril, and Luthor knows this. He admitted he wanted Superman mad. Now ask yourself this, what'll make superman madder than kidnapping his friends, putting WW, BC and Vxen on display like pieces of meat, and laughing about it. I mean it just seems to me that Luthor has Supermans psychology pretty well tagged. Thats what I call writing a complex and beleivable character. And consideing luthor is the same guy who always has a strong woman in a servile position (can you say mercy?) its also perfectly in character. One distinction most gynoceroi can't make is between a sexist story and a sexist character. Of course many seem to think that its OK for a villain to be a thief, murderer, psycho, baby killer, or genocidal maniac, but portraying a villain as a sexist? Oh no, thats crossing the line.

Sigh...... It doesnt make anysense to me either. But then what do I know? I don't worship at the alter of Ms. Andry.

And then Of course DC went and did it again, enraging the gynoceroi even further with "Death of the New Gods #1"

Ragnell the large was so incensed she needed not one, but two posts to contain all the bile it brought up, and SallyP over at green lanterns butt forever chimes in with the exact same points, while Filby Staples vented his spleen in true eunuch underground fashion, once again referencing the exact same points. What offense could be so great that every cell in the vagi-hive would instantly respond in one single unified voice?

Big Barda's death, and the manner of her death, (she died off panel, in the kitchen, without a fight.)

Of course it doesn't matter that all of the New Gods who have died in this stroyline died off-panel, without a fight. Lightray, Grayven, Sleez, etc. Even though the male New Gods got killed the EXACT SAME WAY its still proof of mysogony and sexism. In fact the death of the other New Gods is just a red herring. It was all actually a calculated effort by Jim Starlin to piss of the femmes, I mean come on she dies in the KITCHEN! KITCHEN you get it? You know, near the refrigerator? As in WOMEN IN REFRIGERATORS!

Naturally the fact that Clark and Lois were coming over to dinner, that it was made clear that both Scott and Barda were preparing the food, and that she died in the exact same manner as every single other New God so far, means nothing. Actually thats all just evidence of how sneaky DC really is. You know this whole "Death of the New Gods storyline? Its really just an excuse to kill Big Barda. But dont tell anyone I told ya or they'll revoke my "evil masters of the mysogonistic comics book conspriacy cabal" membership card.

And in the continuing saga of the "Good Feminists" VS the "Bad Feminists" the war continues. You may remember I reported on and added a volley to the Opening Shots being fired by Vince Moore in in this post, and since then new voices have joined up and chosen sides. Big Mike not only fired a few shots of his, he even adapted one of my trademarked phrases to do it, While Boztopia commented in a similar vein, Lisa Fortuner, seemed to think that Comic Journalists should join into the star chamber mentality and go after "mysogonist creators" like they were Mike Nifong running for reelection. Lurker Without on the other hand weighed in by giving us a perfect example of what the whole war is about.

In other news, the rantist formally known as angryrantgirl decided to womyn about thirty year old comics, thus proving once again than when the vaginal hive-mind has nothing to womyn about, they can still find something, while the green lantern objectifying sallyP decided to simply moan all of the afore mentioned issues at once. Say what you will but you gotta respect and effecient use of bile eh? The kamisama on the other hand pointed out soemthing anyone with even a 1/5 of a brain woulda considered self evident, yet somehow sliped by the vagi-hive, along with the treatment of every other dead New Gods character judging fromt he comments on his blog. TheComicaztec pointed out soemthing everybody but minoritists see, and as usual their silence was deafening.

All in All its been a pretty eventful few weeks, with a lot of shrieking, and lot of shrill rhetoric. The estrogen floodwaters rose several feet, and Ms. Andry ran wild over the nets. But never fear, I have come to throw a lifeline of reason seasoned with testosterone to save you from drowning in the lake of the castratti. I will hand you ear plugs of ballsyness to protect you from the feminists siren's song of man hating rage, and a use a chocolate bar to distract Ms. Andry while we make our way into the high happy grunting ground where beautiful young maidens who've never been exposed to feminist fodder serve us ice cold beers carried in shapely arms which frame naked busoms. Follow the sound of my voice back to land of sanity, and all will be well, and all will be well, and all manner of things will be well.

Now I wanna make one last point before I put this post to bed. Theres a huge trend of misandry and a giganormous number of misconceptions in feminism and feminist thought in regards to the male libido. Talk to a few feminists and you'll find they think men should be ashamed of the way we look at women, of the way we think of women, and the way we talk about women. If we look at a woman and all we wanna do is have sex, then we're objectifying her. If an advertiser uses images of beautiful women to sell a product not only is that objectification, its also an attempt to control women by creating unreachable standards of beauty, therby reducing their self confidence. We're told that its Men's fault Women spend billion per year on cosmetics, pushup bras's, shoes, clothes and accessories and assorted other items. We're told that in effect, our libido, our sexuality, our desires are inherantly bad and must be suppresed in order to allow women to be equal. We're told that strip clubs, for example, objectify and use women. We're told that we should be ashamed for watching porn because it contributes to the image of women as sex objects. We're told we should be ashamed of "cheesecake" in comics, images we find attractitive and sexy are somehow incompatible and unecessary in an adventure story. We're told that if we really respect women we wont look at them as potential sexual partners, that we wont comment on their looks, or discuss those looks with other male friends, that we wont fantasize about them and that doing any of the things I've just mentioned is somehow mutually exclusive with respecting a woman as an individual.

The problem is, men dont work that way. Neither does equality. Like it or not, millions of years of evolution have programmed Men with one indisputible, undeniable, biological imperative. Its a simple voice, repeating the same simple message endlessly.

"BOY GO GET YOUR DICK WET!!!!!!!"

I dont care if your a liberal or a conservative, a fagela or a straight up manly man, you could be an east coast intellectual or a southern holy roller, you might be a president and you might be a pauper, but if you got a dick then that message is running through your head every single moment of every single day. Any woman, feminst or toherwise who doesn't understand this is starting out behind the 8-ball. Any theory of sexual interaction that deosn't take this into account is based on a false premise.

Women need to accept this. They need to acept that men and women have different ways of showing interest, lust, respect, admiration etc.

Mad Thinker Scott recently wrote about a study done which managed to piss off both Women and Men, for different reasons, because of the different way Men and Women interpet things. The problem with feminist theory is that, as the name suggests, it looks at everything from the Female, and only from the Female perspective. To a woman, who doesn't think of or interpert things the way a Man does; a guy whose only interest in her is sex is insulting her, because he's "not interested in her as a person". Since most women dont understand the appeal of sex with an anonymous partner, or why it appeals to men, she assumes his interest is disrespectful. Now the truth is, from the male perspective its not, its not meant to be, and if the exact same offer were made by her to him, hed see it as a validation of his manhood.

The problem is feminists want women to be free to "be who they are" but dont want men to be just as free. Feminists used to claim that "if you judge a woman on her abillity to act like a man dont be surprised when she comes out second" but they have now turned that standard on its head. Now unless a man acts like a woman, hes a mysogonist.

Try this experiment. Which of these two women, Laura, or Kara, is being treated as an equal by the men in the following scene's.

Jack, Dave, and Todd, are standign by the water cooler at work talking.

Jack- You fatboy, big T, you looking like the goodyear tire man, need to get your fat ass on the track.

Todd - Tell you what Jack-off, I get my aerobics in every night when your wife comes over for a taste of real manhood.

Jack - Please, doughboy, you wouldn't know real manhood if is shoved it up your ass.

Dave - did you just say you wanted to shove your "manhood" up todd's ass?

Laura walks up tot he cooler and gets some water

Laura - hello

Dave Hi laura, how are you today?

Laura - Im good thanks.

Jack - working hard?

Laura - not if I can help it?

Laura - Bye guys

As laura leaves Kara walks up to get a drink

Todd - hey hey sex queen, stop invading my dreams

Kara - todd, if I didnt youd still be a virgin and your wrists would the size of poeye's

Jack - ouch looks like the cats got her claws out today, I betetr run before she uses me as a scratchin post

Kara - You wish.

David, - he kara howd your date go last night you get laid?

Kara - nahh he was a nice guy but he just didnt do it for me

Todd - Ill do anything you want done sexy

Kara - Honey you aint got the stmina to get it started much less done.

Kara - well boys I gotta get back to work, afterall soomeone in this office has to work like a man.

So after reading those two encounters who did you think was being treated respectfully as an equal?

If you said Kara, congratulations, you have working brain cells.

I'm sure a lot of women, and a whole lot of feminists are thinking "this guys nuts", and you're right. I am nuts. I'm also making a point. The fact is the second conversation is representative of how men talk when we're alone. We insult each others masculinity, success in life, weight, looks, prowess with women, etc. Why? Who the hell knows? Its just the most common way most men bond that doesn't involve either alcohol or violence. And when we treat a woman the same way, it means we are treating her as an equal. No matter how "respectful" the conversation with laura may have seemed at first glance, what the men were really saying is "you're not one of us, you're not like us, and we dont respect you enough to talk to you like your a man" "whereas kara was told " your one of us, you fuck!"

Likewise if you have male friends, and they are "checking out" or "ranking" women, and they don't stop when you come over, thats a good sign. It means they respect you enough to behave honestly. You see most of us men spend the bulk of our lives hiding exactly what we think and feel from women, becasue we've learned that most simply aren't willing to accept what we really think. We know they will judge us. Unlike women, men understand that we are different, and we are willing to put up with all the weird shit women seem to think and feel, no matter how nuts they may be. We just know the feeling is not mutual.

The point is, if you really want true equality between the sexes; then you have to be willing to allow men to be men, and I doubt you feminists can handle that.